All translations are provided for your convenience by the Google Translate Tool. The publishers, authors, and digital providers of this publication are not responsible for any errors that may occur during the translation process. If you intend on relying upon the translation for any purpose other than your own casual enjoyment, you should have this publication professionally translated at your own expense.
Conclusions Of Law
1. This Court has jurisdiction.
2. The out-of-court identifications of the Defendant made by Ms. Werner and Mr. Walter were not unduly suggestive and therefore did not violate Defendant’s due process rights and should not be suppressed.
3. The in-court identifications of the Defendant made by the alleged victims were not unduly suggestive and therefore do not violate Defendant’s due process rights and should not be suppressed.
Continued to next issue (9/18/2009)
|
